|
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 25 2000
New
Studies Find Dental Amalgam Fillings to
be the No.1 Source of Mercury in Most People
and Daily Exposure Exceeds Government Health
Standards for Inorganic Mercury(vapor).
Studies also found adverse
health effects in adults and that mercury
from amalgam is passed on to infants through
mother's blood and milk and that developmental
effects on infants occur at low levels of
mercury exposure.
A
large National Institute of Dental Research
Study has confirmed other previous study
results that found that the current type
of amalgam dental fillings being used in
the U.S. leak significant amounts of the
extremely toxic substance mercury into the
body and are the number one source of mercury
in people. The study measured mercury levels
in the blood and urine of over 1000 military
personnel and found a high significant correlation
to the number of amalgam filling surfaces
in the mouth. Like several other recent
studies the study found that amalgam fillings
are not stable because of mercury's low
vapor pressure and galvanic action between
the different metals in the mouth. For this
large military population that had a range
of from 0 to 66 amalgam filling surfaces
and an average of 20 surfaces each 10 surfaces
added approximately 1 microgram of mercury
per liter of urine excreted meaning total
mercury excreted in urine averaged about
4.5 micrograms per day with soldiers levels
with over 49 amalgam surfaces averaging
over 8.7 micrograms. The average level for
those with fillings was 4.5 times that of
the controls without amalgam and those with
over 49 surfaces averaged over 8 times controls.
Together with the considerably larger amount
of mercury excreted daily through the digestive
tract and sweat the daily mercury excretion
would amount to well over 10 micrograms
per day on average and much more for some
individuals. Over 90 % of the mercury in
the urine was inorganic mercury the kind
that comes from fillings as opposed to organic
mercury which comes from fish.
For
this population it was determined that the
exposure from amalgam fillings was the primary
source of mercury exposure and on average
exceeded the levels that would be consistent
with U.S. Government Standards(MRL) for
daily mercury exposure. The study's findings
were consistent with the findings of many
other recent such studies including a similar
study testing 20000 people at a University
Health Clinic in Germany as well as the
findings of the World Health Organization
Scientific Panel on mercury.
The
U.S.EPA mercury health guideline for elemental
mercury exposure(vapor) is 0.3 micrograms
per cubic meter of air(0.3 ug/M3). For the
average adult breathing 20 M3 of air per
day this amounts to an exposure of 6 micrograms(ug)
per day.
The
U.S. Department of Health Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry
(ASTDR) standard (MRL) -for acute inhalation
exposure to mercury vapor is 0.2 micrograms
Hg/M3 which translates to approx. 4 ug/day
for the average adult(5).
The
corresponding tolerable daily exposure developed
in a report for the Canadian Health Agency
Health Canada is .014 ug/kg body weight
or 1 ug/day for average adult(6). The permissible
level for a child would be less. But the
levels of the average daily exposures found
in the study were above all of these health
guidelines for mercury exposure.
Other
studies that the Government Health Standards
were based on have found adverse health
effects at very low levels and developmental
effects on infants and children at very
low levels of exposure along with finding
that mercury vapor from a mother's fillings
is readily transferred through the mother's
blood across the placenta to a fetus and
also through mother's milk.
These
findings increase the urgency to advise
the public of the clear danger in the use
of mercury in fillings and to reconsider
the policy of using mercury in dental fillings.
Based on such studies several other countries
such as Sweden Australia Japan and Canada
have already adopted restrictions or warnings
on the use of mercury in fillings such as
for children pregnant women women of child
bearing age people with damaged kidneys
or immune systems and in the mouth adjacent
to other metals. Amalgam manufacturers have
also warned against some of the uses currently
made of amalgam in dentistry in the U.S.
Studies
are also available that confirm adverse
health effects from amalgam fillings and
clinically document that many thousands
of people have recovered or had significant
improvement in many health conditions including
very serious conditions after replacement
of amalgam fillings. Fact sheets are available
from DAMS with medical study references
covering the statements and issues in this
press release.
DAMS
is currently working with very many people
in the U.S. dealing with serious health
effects caused by exposure to mercury from
amalgam and urges everyone to find out more
about this major problem and to get involved
in resolving these health safety issues.
DAMS can provide information and help to
anyone who is interested or who thinks they
might have health problems related to their
amalgam fillings.
Available
fact sheets with medical study references
include:
1.
Common Exposure Levels from Amalgam Fillings
and Government Health Standards
2.
Transfer of Mercury from Mother's Amalgams
and Breast Milk to the Fetus and developmental
effects
of mercury on infants.
3.
Documentation of recovery from 60000 clinical
cases of serious adverse health effects
after replacement of amalgam fillings.
4.
Adverse oral health problems related to
amalgam fillings.
5.
Effect of mercury and other toxic metal
exposure on cognitive and behavioral problems
of
children- including ADD dyslexia juvenile
delinquency and crime.
6
Autoimmune conditions: the connection to
mercury immune reactivity and amalgam fillings.
7.
The battery in your mouth: oral galvanic
currents and metals in the mouth and interactions
with EMF
8.
Health Effects of amalgam fillings and results
of replacement of amalgam filings. Over
600 medical study references(most in Medline)
and approx. 60000 clinical cases of amalgam
replacement followed by doctors.
Local
contact person: (I suggest reference #1
and Kingman's abstract be attached to all
PRs
National
contact person: ( issue paper requests-
perhaps free with membership or $2 each
perhaps
free with membership free to media by E-mail
or $2 each for handling cost by mail. this
can also be distributed to media or non
media through other mechanisms and additional
distribution as a fact sheet or brochure
to spread the message increase contacts
and membership.
You
already have # 1 and also have likely seen
all the other fact sheets. Each local coordinator
who has E-mail
should
list their E-mail address on the PR and
have access to the Fact sheets/papers for
distribution as well as who to contact for
technical questions probably me at home
or someone else with me as backup if needed.
(as
an alternative the papers are available
on a web page that will be noted on PR)
Abstract:
Kingman
A Albertini T Brown LJ
J
Dent Res 1998 Mar;77(3):461-71
Mercury
concentrations in urine and whole blood
associated with amalgam exposure in a US
military population.
Oral
Health Promotion Risk Factors and Molecular
Epidemiology Branch National Institute of
Dental Research Bethesda Maryland 20892
USA.
Minute
amounts of mercury vapor are released from
dental amalgams. Since mercury vapor is
known to be associated with adverse health
effects from occupationally exposed persons
questions regarding the margin of safety
for exposure to mercury vapor in the general
population continue to be raised. To address
this issue one needs information regarding
exposure to mercury vapor from dental amalgam
fillings and its possible consequences for
health in the general population. The NIDR
Amalgam Study is designed to obtain precise
information on amalgam exposure and health
outcomes for a non-occupationally-exposed
population of US adults. One hypothesis
was that in a generally healthy population
a significant association between amalgam
exposure and Hg levels in urine and/or whole
blood could be detected. The cohort investigated
was an adult military population of 1127
healthy males. Their average age was 52.8
years and their ages varied from 40 to 78
years. Ninety-five percent of the study
participants were white males and slightly
over 50% had some college education. Five
percent were edentulous. The dentate participants
on average had 25 natural teeth 36.9 decayed
or filled surfaces (DFS) and 19.9 surfaces
exposed to amalgam with amalgam exposure
varying from 0 to 66 surfaces. Their average
total and inorganic urinary mercury concentrations
were 3.09 microg/L and 2.88 microg/L. The
average whole-blood total and inorganic
mercury concentrations were 2.55 microg/L
and 0.54 microg/L. Significant correlations
were detected between amalgam exposure and
the total (r = 0.34 p < 0.001) and inorganic
0.34 (r = 0.34 p < 0.001) urinary mercury
concentrations on the original scale. Stronger
correlations were found for total (r = 0.44
p < 0.001) and inorganic (r = 0.41 p
< 0.001) urinary Hg on the log scale
as well as for creatinine-corrected total
(r = 0.43 p < 0.001) and inorganic (r
= 0.43 p < 0.001) urine concentrations.
In whole blood statistically significant
but biologically weak correlations were
detected for total (r = 0.09 p = 0.005)
and inorganic (r = 0.15 p < 0.001) Hg
concentrations respectively. Based on these
cross-sectional data it is estimated that
on average each ten-surface increase in
amalgam exposure is associated with an increase
of 1 microg/L mercury in urine concentration.
PMID:
9496919 UI: 98156633
Ref.
Paper #1 (You've seen this before)
"Dental
Amalgam Fillings" is the Number One Source
of Mercury in People and Exposure
Exceeds Government Health Standards for
Inorganic mercury(vapor)
Government
agencies and medical studies have found
that the number one source of mercury in
people is from dental amalgam fillings(ref
2-20). Exposure from fillings amounts to
from 50 to 90 percent of exposure with the
average being about 80 % of total exposure(5-912-151920).
The studies found that mercury amalgams
are unstable due to mercury's low vapor
pressure and galvanic action leaking mercury
vapor continuously into the lungs and saliva
at levels exceeding health standards.
Mercury
exposure of most people with fillings was
found to exceed government health standards
and levels found to cause adverse health
effects(see below).
The
tolerable daily exposure level for mercury
developed in a report for Health Canada
is .014 micrograms/kilogram body weight(ug/kg)
or approximately 1 ug/day for average adult(2).
The U.S. EPA Health Standard for elemental
mercury exposure(vapor) is 0.3 micrograms
per cubic meter of air(1). The U.S. ATSDR
health standard(MRL) for mercury vapor is
0.2 ug/ M3 of air and the MRL for methyl
mercury is 0.3 ug/kg body weight/day(4).
For the average adult breathing 20 M3 of
air per day this amounts to an exposure
of 4 or 6 ug/day for the 2 elemental mercury
standards. The EPA health guideline for
methyl mercury is 0.1 ug/kg body weight
per day or 7 ug for the average adult(1).
The
range of mercury exposure levels found in
people with amalgam fillings by the
World Health Organization Scientific Panel
on Mercury was 3 to 70 micrograms per day(3)
with other medical studies finding up to
500 ug/day in gum chewers or people who
grind their teeth(611161718). The average
exposure was above 10 ug/day (ref. 3-18).
The average mercury exposure for a Canadian
adult with amalgam fillings was found in
the Health Canada study to be 9 ug/day(2).
In a large German study with 20000 tested
subjects at a University Medical Clinic
the average exposure from fillings was over
10 ug/day and over 50 % of all those with
6 or more amalgam fillings had daily exposure
exceeding the EPA health guideline(6).
Studies
have consistently found modern high copper
non gamma-two amalgams have greater release
of mercury vapor than conventional silver
amalgams (212223). Recent studies have concluded
that because of the high mercury release
levels of modern amalgams mercury poisoning
from amalgam fillings is widespread throughout
the population"(1722186).
Common
levels found in persons with amalgam fillings
are over 10 times the Health Canada TDE
and more than the EPA health standard for
mercury vapor. Thus persons with amalgam
fillings have levels of intraoral mercury
vapor and body exposure levels higher than
the level considered to have significant
health risk.
The
studies found that Total mercury intake
is proportional to the number and extent
of amalgam surfaces but other factors such
as chewing gum and drinking hot liquids
influence the intake significantly increasing
exposure as much as 500%. ).
A
World Health Organzation Scientific Panel
concluded that a safe level of mercury exposure
below which no adverse effects occur has
never been established(3)
References
(1)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)
1996 "Integrated Risk Information System
National Center for Invironmental AssessmentCincinnati
Ohio(& web).
(2)
Mark Richardson Environmental Health DirectorateHealth
Canada Assessment of Mercury Exposure and
Risks from Dental Amalgam 1995 Final Report.
(3)
World Health Organization(WHO)1991 Environmental
Health criteria 118 Inorganic Mercury WHO
Geneva;
(4)Agency
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
U.S. Public Health Service "Toxicological
Profile for Mercury"March 1999; & Apr
191999 Media Advisory New MRLs for toxic
substances MRL:elemental mercury vapor/inhalation/
chronic & MRL: methy mercury/ oral/acute;
& http://atsdr1.atsdr.cdc.gov:8080/97list.html.
(5)
A.Kingman et al National Institute of Dental
Research "Mercury concentrations in urine
and blood associated with amalgam exposure
in the U.S. military population" Dent Res
1998 77(3):461-71.
(6)
Dr. P.Kraub & M.Deyhle Universitat Tubingen-
Institut fur Organische Chemie "Field Study
on the Mercury Content of Saliva" 1997 (20000
people tested for mercury level in saliva
and health status/symptoms compiled) http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/KRAUSS/amalgam.html;
(7)
A. Engqvist et al "Speciation of mercury
excreted in feces from individuals with
amalgam fillings" Arch Environ Health 1998
53(3):205-13; & Dept. of Toxicology
& Chemistry Stockholm Univ. National
Institute for Working Life 1998.(www.niwl.se/ah/1998-02.html)
(8)
J.A.Weiner et al"The relationship between
mercury concentration in human organs and
predictor variables"138(1-3):101-1151993;
& "An estimation of the uptake of mercury
from amalgam fillings" Sci Total Environmetv168n31995.
(9)
M.J.Vimy and F.L. Lorscheider Faculty of
Medicine Univ. Of Calgary July 1991. (Study
findings) & J. Trace Elem. Exper. Med.
19903 111-123.
(10)
B.Arnold Eigenschaften und Einsatzgebiete
des Chelatbildners:DMPS" Z.Umweltmedizin
19975(1):38-; & Diagnostik un Monitorung
von SchwermetallbelastungenIIIZWR 1996105(10):586-569
& (11):665-
(11)
L.Barregard et al "People with high mercury
uptake from their own dental amalgam fillings"
Occup Envir Med 1995 52:124-128.
(12)
L.Bjorkman et al "Mercury in saliva and
feces after removal of amalgam fillings"
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1997 144(1): 156-162.
(13)
M.Molin et al "kinetics of mercury in blood
and urine after mercury removal"
J
Dent Research 1995 74:420-
(15)
J.Begerow et al "Long Term Mercury Excretion
in Urine after Removal of Amalgam Fillings"
Int Arch Occup Health 66: 209-212.
(16)
G.Sallsten et al "long term use of chewing
gum and mercury exposure from dental amalgam"
J Dental Research 1996 75(1):594-598.
(17)
I.Skare "Mass Balance and Systemic Uptake
of Mercury Released from Dental Fillings"
Water Air and Soil Pollution 80(1-4):59-67
1995.
(18)
B.Windham Anotated Bibliography of Exposure
and Health Effects from
Amalgam
Fillings 1997(over 500 references).
(19)
Halbach 1995"Estimation of mercury dose
.." Int.Archieves of Occupational
&
Environmental Health 67:295-300; & G.
Sandborgh-Englund "Pharmacokinetics of mercury
from dental amalgam" Gotab(Stockholm) 1998
1-49.
(20)
H.V.Aposhian Envir.Health Perspectives Vol
106Supp 4 Aug 1998; &
H.V.
Aposhian et al FASEB J 6: 2472-2476 1992.
(21)
J Pleva "Mercury- A Public Health Hazard"
Reviews on Environmental Health 1994 10:1-27.
(22)
C. Toomvali "Studies of mercury vapor emission
from different dental amalgam alloys" LIU-IFM-Kemi-EX
1501988; & A.Berglund"A study of the
release of mercury vapor from different
types of amalgam alloys" J Dent Res 1993
72: 939-946; & D.B.Boyer "Mercury vaporization
from corroded dental amalgam" Dental Materials
1988 4:89-93; & V.Psarras et al " Mercury
vapour releases from dental amalgams" Swed
Dent J1994 18:15-23; & L.E.Moberg "Long
term corrosion studies of amalgams and Casting
alloys in contact" Acta Odontal Scand 1985
43:163-177;
(23)
H. Lichtenberg "Mercury vapor in the oral
cavity in relation to the number of amalgam
fillings and chronic mercury poisoning"
Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine 1996
11:2 87-94.
|