May 11 2001
The Honorable Dan Burton
Chairman
Committee on Government Reform
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington D.C. 20515
RE: Autism - Why the Increased Rates? A One Year
Update
Dear Mr. Chairman:
The American Dental Association
(ADA) requests that the Committee on Government
Reform accept this letter as a statement for the
record for the committee's hearing on April 25
entitled "Autism -- Why the Increased Rates? A
One Year Update."
During the hearing Dr. Boyd E.
Haley stated in his testimony that elementary
mercury from dental amalgams could work synergistically
with other ethyl-mercury sources and have a cumulative
toxic affect on the body. Dr. Haley postulated
that this could be a potential cause of autism
and Alzheimer's disease.
There is no scientifically valid
evidence linking either autism or Alzheimer's
disease with dental amalgam. And there is no scientifically
valid evidence demonstrating in vivo transformation
of inorganic or mercury vapor into organo mercury
species in individuals occupationally exposed
to amalgam mercury vapor. (Chang S.B. et al. Factors
Affecting Blood Mercury Concentrations in Practicing
Dentists; Journal of Dental Research 1992 71(1)
66-74).
Based on currently available
scientific evidence the ADA believes that dental
amalgam is a safe affordable and durable material
for all but a handful of individuals who are allergic
to one of its components. It contains a mixture
of metals such as silver copper and tin in addition
to mercury which chemically binds these components
into a hard stable and safe substance. Dental
amalgam has been used for more than 150 years
and during that time has established an extensively
reviewed record of safety and effectiveness.
Issued in late 1997 the FDI World
Dental Federation and the World Health Organization
consensus statement on dental amalgam stated "No
controlled studies have been published demonstrating
systemic adverse effects from amalgam restorations."
The document also states that aside from rare
instances of local side effects of allergic reactions
"the small amount of mercury released from amalgam
restorations especially during placement and removal
has not been shown to cause any adverse health
effects."
The ADA's Council on Scientific
Affairs' 1998 report on its review of the recent
scientific literature on amalgam states: "The
Council concludes that based on available scientific
information amalgam continues to be a safe and
effective restorative material." The Council's
report also states "There currently appears to
be no justification for discontinuing the use
of dental amalgam."
In an article published in the
February 1999 issue of the Journal of the American
Dental Association researchers report finding
"no significant association of Alzheimer's disease
with the number surface area or history of having
dental amalgam restorations" and "no statistically
significant differences in brain mercury levels
between subjects with Alzheimer's disease and
control subjects."
The U.S. Public Health Service
issued a report in 1993 stating there is no health
reason not to use amalgam except in the extremely
rare case of the patient who is allergic to a
component of amalgam. This supports the findings
of the Food and Drug Administration the National
Institutes of Health Technology Assessment Conference
and the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial
Research that dental amalgam is a safe and effective
restorative material.
There have been several peer
reviewed scientific studies concerning the safety
of dental amalgam. These studies disprove any
link between dental amalgam and various medical
conditions. We have listed some of them below:
* Dahl JE Sundby J Hensten-Pettersen
A Jacobsen N. " Dental Workplace exposure and
effect on fertility " Scand J Work Environ Health
1999 Jun;25(3):285-90. The study groups consisted
of 558 female dental surgeons (1/3 of whom placed
more than 50 fillings a week) and 450 high school
teachers (control) that had given birth in Norway
to at least 1 living child. The study comprised
data from a total of 1408 pregnancies. The effects
of practicing dentistry and of the given workplace
exposure on fertility were analyzed with the discrete
proportional hazard regression method. Conclusions:
Occupational exposures had no clear adverse effects
on fertility among the female dental surgeons
studied.
* Schuurs AH. " Reproductive
toxicity of occupational mercury. A review of
the literature" J. Dent 1999;27(4):249-56. This
paper provides insight into the potential reproductive
effects on handling dental silver amalgam. Both
animals and case reports and epidemiological studies
were reviewed. Conclusions: The studies conclude
that negative reproductive effects from exposure
to mercury in the dental office are unproven.
Consequently given the low amounts of mercury
stemming from dental amalgam fillings the population
at large are at even less risk than dental staff.
* Saxe SR Wekstein MW et al.
"Alzheimer's disease dental amalgam and mercury"
JADA 1999 Feb;130(2):191-9 This study consisted
of 68 human subjects with diagnosed Alzheimer's
disease and 33 control subjects without Alzheimer's
to determine mercury levels in multiple brain
regions at autopsy and to ascertain the subjects'
dental amalgam status and history. Conclusions:
Mercury in dental amalgam restorations does not
appear to be a neurotoxic factor in the pathogenesis
of this disease. The authors found that brain
mercury levels are not associated with dental
amalgam either from existing amalgam restorations
or according to subjects' dental amalgam restoration
history. Furthermore dental amalgam restorations
regardless of number occlusal surface area or
time do not relate to brain mercury level.
* Ahlqwist M Bengtsson C et al
"Serum mercury concentration in relation to survival
symptoms and diseases: results from the prospective
population study of women in Gotherburg Sweden.
Acta Odontol Scand 1999 June; 57(3):168-74 This
prospective population study of women in Gothenburg
Sweden was started in 1968-69 and comprised of
1462 women aged 38-60 years at baseline. Follow-up
studies were conducted in 1974-75 1980-81 and
1992-93. Conclusions: No statistically significant
correlation was observed between dental amalgam
and the incidence of diabetes myocardial infarction
stroke or cancer. No association was established
between disease and mercury on a population basis
in middle-aged and older women.
The National Institute of Dental
and Craniofacial Research is currently supporting
two very large clinical trials on the health effects
of dental amalgam. Studies underway for several
years each in Portugal and the Northeastern United
States involve not only direct neurophysiological
measures but also behavioral and cognitive functional
assessments. In addition the trials are monitoring
the impact of amalgam on immune function antibiotic
resistance and renal function. Preliminary findings
from these studies are consistent with any number
of small and large epidemiological studies published
over the years concerning the health effects of
dental amalgam.
The ADA supports ongoing research
in the development of new materials that it hopes
will someday prove to be as safe and effective
as dental amalgam. However the ADA continues to
believe that amalgam is a valuable viable and
safe choice for dental patients and concurs with
the findings of the U.S. Public Health Service
that amalgam has "continuing value in maintaining
oral health."
Sincerely
Signed
Robert M. Anderton D.D.S. J.D. LL.M. President
RMA:MT:chf